Wednesday, February 24, 2010

CNN coverage of the Financial Crisis

As the United States' number two cable news network and its rank as third among online global news websites, CNN has been a significant presence in the news for the past thirty years. One of the major news events they have covered in the recent years has been the financial crisis. We examined CNN's coverage of this crisis through both their online content and broadcasts.


Overall, we found CNN's coverage of the financial crisis to be generally effective. In regards to their cable broadcasts, they have been consistent in their use of expert analysis. This consistency proves to be both effective and ineffective for the news source. While it serves to point out both sides of the issue, in some cases the actual information tends to become hidden in ensuing arguments. Both their online content and broadcasts have been clear and concise, and it is evident that they are making an effort to make important information accessible to the average viewer.

Eric Smith, Jordan Swift, Danny Rohde, Jessica Wasniewski, Nathalie Kanicki

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Response to Adam Davidson's Reporting on The Financial Crisis

The one quote I heard during this broadcast which struck me the most were the words of President Obama, “there are times when you can focus on redecorating your house and there are times when you need to focus on rebuilding its foundation and today is a day when we need to focus on rebuilding foundation”. This was very striking to me because many individuals were disconnected from the crisis in the beginning and are only now feeling the repercussions. It was evident that in the first few months of the development of the idea that without a bailout we may not have an economy, people were going about their daily lives in a way that downplayed the crisis ahead. All of a sudden, people started losing their homes and were defaulting on their credit loans. It was these repercussions that made individuals realize that there was a massive power present that they did not have control over.

What I liked about Adam Davidson's reporting was the way he explained terminology such as ‘leverage’ and ‘knitting’ when it came to hedge funds. He realized that listeners do not always understand the scenario in the same way as finance analysts do. He also, in very simple way, explained how banks work, what was wrong with them, and ways to fix them. He really targeted the cognitive understanding of the listener.

The big question seemed to be “What is better for the country”? Many believed that the billion dollar bailout would not help the future generation, but instead would relay the problem of debt onto future taxpayers. Many people believe there are other issues to deal with and that the government bailout in not a positive thing. This mentality quickly changed when individuals started becoming more nervous as the crisis began manifesting itself into a more serious reality. Doing something was better than doing nothing. One question I would pose Davidson in this instance is: Why are individuals opinions so easily and quickly swayed in these situations? Is it due to their personal interests at stake?

What could the government have done to prevent this recession? People pointed fingers to better regulation of credit default swaps. But what really went wrong? The main point to take away from broadcasts like this is that the crisis is, indeed, severe and something needs to be done…sooner rather than later.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Hurricane Katrina Presentation Summary

The goal of this presentation is to show and explain effective and ineffective examples of the media coverage of Hurricane Katrina. Before looking at the coverage by various news sources of Hurricane Katrina, we first examined how previous Hurricanes were covered. To do this, we looked at a clip of NBC News in July of 2005 of the media coverage of Hurricane Dennis.



While there was some effective reporting done, much of the media coverage was framed in such a way which made the effectiveness of the media coverage of the event mixed. This also sets up the views that many Americans have of Katrina, because the media played a very important role in shaping the minds of their viewers and many news outlets framed the event incorrectly.